Thursday, November 18, 2010

Growing Indian Automobile Industry



In the race to be a superpower, India is making frequent and astounding advancements in all fields. From power generation to constructing modern roads, every sector has a huge impetus. Rising above all in a very distinct and appreciable way is the Automobile Sector of India. The automobile sector forms one of the fastest growing sectors in the Indian economy and so is the popularity of automobiles in India. A number of cars and other automobiles are imported and exported every year. Indian Automobile market witnesses a large scale manufacturing of cars, bikes, vans, buses and tractors.

Indian automobile industry is the tenth largest in the world. Every year new and advanced model of cars, bikes and other vehicles are launched by various leading manufacturers suiting the consumer needs. Occupied by various major automobile manufacturers like Tata Motors, Ford Motors, Volkswagen, Maruti Udyog, Hero Honda, Bajaj Auto, Yamaha Motor etc, Indian Autombile industry has become a battlefield of technology, performance and styling. Automobile industry in India is one of the fastest growing automobile industries and has made its position in the world market.

The Indian automobile Industry is currently growing at a remarkable pace of around 18 % per annum. The technological changes and progress successfully led to the progress of automobile sector in India. The main reason behind this tremendous progress is the economic liberalization by Indian government.

Ever since the foreign direct investment has been allowed, the automobile market has got its foot on the accelerator. The growth of Indian middle class with increasing purchasing power and availability of trained manpower at reasonable cost is another reason for the eminent growth and has pushed it to new capacities. International automobiles giants have helped Indian automobile sector to enlarge by setting up local basis. The increasing competition in auto companies has opened up many choices for Indian consumers at competitive costs. The Indian Automobile industry is growing in all respects and it is also serving as an important source of employment. Innovation and new product launches are a major factor driving growth in sales of cars. A wide distribution & service station network is a key to growth in India. The automobile sector is expected to witness strong growth and improve its share in global markets too.

www.made-from-india.com with versatile experience in the automobile industry, maintains a huge database of manufacturers, exporters and suppliers of automobile, automobile factories, auto accessories, auto body building & parts, auto electrical spares, auto parts, brakes, tyres & tubes etc.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Car Quality Rankings 2010 - Change in Automobile Manufacturer Quality



While many consumers may harbor hope that the quality of an automobile manufacturer's product may change, or has changed, either their manufacturer's quality may improve or has improved or a competitor's quality may worsen or has worsened, the data suggest that more significant improvement may require decades of effort, but a significant decline may occur more speedily.

First, an examination of some of the changes in car manufacturer Reliability Percent rank Averages from 1988 to 1998 yields the following:

BMW AG: 0.43 (in 1998) minus 0.85 (in 1988) equals a change of -0.42
Chrysler Group: 0.32 - 0.32 = 0.00
Ford Motor Company: 0.51 - 0.33 = +0.18
General Motors Corporation: 0.30 - 0.44 = -0.14
Honda Motor Company: 0.92 - 0.91 = +0.01
Mazda Motor Corporation: 0.67 - 0.92 = -0.25
Mercedes-Benz: 0.43 - 0.87 = -0.44
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 0.57 - 0.81 = -0.24
Nissan Motor Company: 0.74 - 0.87 = -0.13
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 0.80 - 0.72 = +0.08
Toyota Motor Corporation: 0.90 - 0.92 = -0.02
Volkswagen AG: 0.13 - 0.35 = -0.24

From this list, the greatest improvement in car manufacturer quality standing was achieved by Ford Motor Company, with a rather modest gain of +0.18 percent rank points, and that four manufacturers suffered declines exceeding this modest gain, with one suffering a decline substantially exceeding Ford's gain.

Second, an examination of the changes in car manufacturer percent shares of Consumer Reports' annual Used-Cars-to-Avoid lists from 1992 to 2010 yields the following:

BMW AG: 6% (in 2010) minus 0% (in 1992) equals a change of 6%
Chrysler Group: 18% - 25% = -7%
Ford Motor Company: 10% - 23% = -13%
General Motors Corporation: 41% - 43% = -2%
Honda Motor Company: 0% - 0% = 0%
Mazda Motor Corporation: 1% - 3% = -2%
Mercedes-Benz: 3% - 0% = 3%
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 0% - 0% = 0%
Nissan Motor Company: 3% - 0% = 3%
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 0% - 1% = -1%
Toyota Motor Corporation: 1% - 0% = 1%
Volkswagen AG: 11% - 2% = 9%

From this list, Ford Motor Company's quality improvement (reduction in its share of CR's worst) exceeds Volkswagen AG's quality decline (increase in its share of CR's worst).

Third, an examination of the change in each car manufacturer's 2010 Auto Reliability Grade Point Average from model years 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 to model years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 yields the following:

BMW AG: 1.39 (for 2006 to 2009) minus 1.65 (for 2000 to 2003) equals a change of -0.26
Chrysler Group: 0.99 - 1.29 = -0.30
Ford Motor Company: 2.21 - 2.01 = +0.20
General Motors Corporation: 1.25 - 1.35 = -0.10
Honda Motor Company: 3.47 - 3.27 = +0.20
Mazda Motor Corporation: 2.47 - 2.68 = -0.21
Mercedes-Benz: 1.60 - 2.39 = -0.79
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 3.00 - 2.25 = +0.75
Nissan Motor Company: 2.43 - 2.61 = -0.18
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 2.92 - 2.10 = +0.82
Toyota Motor Corporation: 3.34 - 3.72 = -0.38
Volkswagen AG: 1.85 - 1.06 = +0.79

By this list, Subaru, Volkswagen, and Mitsubishi have shown the greatest improvement; however, Subaru's Auto Reliability Grade for the most recent model years is a B (exactly the same as its overall 2010 average and likely what it would have been in 1988), Mitsubishi's is a B (also exactly the same as its overall 2010 average and likely what it would have been in 1988), and Volkswagen's is a C (versus an overall 2010 average of a D).

Also by this list, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, and BMW suffered the greatest decline. Toyota's reliability remains strong, with an Auto Reliability Grade of a very strong B even for the most recent model years. However, BMW's grade for the most recent model years (2006 to 2009) is a D and Mercedes' is a C, both having declined rather significantly from 1988, when they would likely have both been Bs.

Most telling of the time and effort required to improve quality are Ford's improvements. Ford has shown gains in all three of the above reliability measures and its rise in quality is noticeable as early as 1991; nonetheless, its 2010 Auto Reliability GPA for the most recent model years (2006 to 2009) is a very modest 2.21, a C by letter grade. This suggests that it may be decades more before Ford Motor Company will match the reliability of Honda Motor Company (with a 2010 overall GPA of 3.35) or Toyota Motor Corporation (with a 2010 overall GPA of 3.49) and many decades more before the remaining two of the Detroit Three will match the reliability of the automotive industry's leaders.

www.made-from-india.com with versatile experience in the automobile industry, maintains a huge database of manufacturers, exporters and suppliers of automobile, automobile factories, auto accessories, auto body building & parts, auto electrical spares, auto parts, brakes, tyres & tubes etc.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Automobile Recalls



Recalls have featured heavily in the news lately. Whether the recall was for faulty brakes, sticky accelerators, or some other safety hazard, the reason it was issued was to notify owners of the vehicle that their vehicles are unsafe and need to be repaired immediately.

When a recall is issued, the purpose of it is for people to take notice and, as a result, to take action. Failure to respond to a recall may place an individual's life in danger. As such, individuals who receive recalls through the mail, television, or Internet should act on the recalls immediately.

In most cases, recalls address issues such as:

  • Auto parts that wear out too fast
  • Faults in safety features
  • Electrical problems

Since these problems can either put a driver in danger or severely inhibit his or her ability to safely drive his or her automobile, auto manufacturers are usually quick to pick up on problems and issue recalls to prevent bad publicity and injuries to their consumers. Unfortunately, recalls typically are not issued until an individual suffers an injury in an accident. These individuals who are in the accidents that spawn recalls may be entitled to financial compensation for their injuries.

Before pursuing legal action to seek financial compensation, victims of faulty automobiles should first consult with an experienced auto defects lawyer to learn more about their legal rights and responsibilities. It is important to note that hiring a lawyer does not guarantee a victory, but it may increase an individual's likelihood of winning his or her case.

www.made-from-india.com with versatile experience in the automobile industry, maintains a huge database of manufacturers, exporters and suppliers of automobile, automobile factories, auto accessories, auto body building & parts, auto electrical spares, auto parts, brakes, tyres & tubes etc.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Automobile Air Cleaners



Exposure to auto exhaust on a regular basis can cause lowered immunity, breathing problems, and lowered cognitive ability. In an ideal world, a car's emissions would include carbon dioxide and water. However, in reality a variety of harmful substances like carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and ozone are produced.

Although cars today are built in an environment friendly manner and emit 80-97% less pollution than cars manufactured prior to 1970, the problem still persists. This is due to the increase in volume of cars and higher emissions from light trucks and minivans since they are designed to carry heavier loads. Falling sick due to such unhealthy air must seem inevitable considering that a significant part of your day is spent on the road. The answer to this problem could be the installation of an automobile air cleaner.

An automobile air cleaner helps to remove toxins from the air in trucks, cars, and even boats. They cleanse the air of particulate matter like dust, pollen, cigarette smoke, fumes and other noxious gases that one encounters on the move.

Each purifier has different features to get rid of different particulates. Hence, it is better to get a model with multiple cleaning devices. Carbon filters are a must to help get rid of smoke and other harmful gases. A HEPA filter is good to remove aerial particles. For pollutants which settle down on surfaces, an ionic purifier acts efficiently. Technology has also offered portable air purifiers. These don't take up any passenger space. They can be strapped on behind the headrest of the front seat. Some can even be plugged into the vehicle's cigarette lighter. They run on the vehicle's own power. To sum them up, they are efficient, unobtrusive, and inexpensive.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Car Quality Rankings 2010 - Change in Automobile Manufacturer Quality Standings May Take Decades



While many consumers may harbor hope that the quality of an automobile manufacturer's product may change, or has changed, either their manufacturer's quality may improve or has improved or a competitor's quality may worsen or has worsened, the data suggest that more significant improvement may require decades of effort, but a significant decline may occur more speedily.

First, an examination of some of the changes in car manufacturer Reliability Percentrank Averages from 1988 to 1998 yields the following:

BMW AG: 0.43 (in 1998) minus 0.85 (in 1988) equals a change of -0.42
Chrysler Group: 0.32 - 0.32 = 0.00
Ford Motor Company: 0.51 - 0.33 = +0.18
General Motors Corporation: 0.30 - 0.44 = -0.14
Honda Motor Company: 0.92 - 0.91 = +0.01
Mazda Motor Corporation: 0.67 - 0.92 = -0.25
Mercedes-Benz: 0.43 - 0.87 = -0.44
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 0.57 - 0.81 = -0.24
Nissan Motor Company: 0.74 - 0.87 = -0.13
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 0.80 - 0.72 = +0.08
Toyota Motor Corporation: 0.90 - 0.92 = -0.02
Volkswagen AG: 0.13 - 0.35 = -0.24

From this list, the greatest improvement in car manufacturer quality standing was achieved by Ford Motor Company, with a rather modest gain of +0.18 percentrank points, and that four manufacturers suffered declines exceeding this modest gain, with one suffering a decline substantially exceeding Ford's gain.

Second, an examination of the changes in car manufacturer percent shares of Consumer Reports' annual Used-Cars-to-Avoid lists from 1992 to 2010 yields the following:

BMW AG: 6% (in 2010) minus 0% (in 1992) equals a change of 6%
Chrysler Group: 18% - 25% = -7%
Ford Motor Company: 10% - 23% = -13%
General Motors Corporation: 41% - 43% = -2%
Honda Motor Company: 0% - 0% = 0%
Mazda Motor Corporation: 1% - 3% = -2%
Mercedes-Benz: 3% - 0% = 3%
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 0% - 0% = 0%
Nissan Motor Company: 3% - 0% = 3%
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 0% - 1% = -1%
Toyota Motor Corporation: 1% - 0% = 1%
Volkswagen AG: 11% - 2% = 9%

From this list, Ford Motor Company's quality improvement (reduction in its share of CR's worst) exceeds Volkswagen AG's quality decline (increase in its share of CR's worst).

Third, an examination of the change in each car manufacturer's 2010 Auto Reliability Grade Point Average from model years 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 to model years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 yields the following:

BMW AG: 1.39 (for 2006 to 2009) minus 1.65 (for 2000 to 2003) equals a change of -0.26
Chrysler Group: 0.99 - 1.29 = -0.30
Ford Motor Company: 2.21 - 2.01 = +0.20
General Motors Corporation: 1.25 - 1.35 = -0.10
Honda Motor Company: 3.47 - 3.27 = +0.20
Mazda Motor Corporation: 2.47 - 2.68 = -0.21
Mercedes-Benz: 1.60 - 2.39 = -0.79
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation: 3.00 - 2.25 = +0.75
Nissan Motor Company: 2.43 - 2.61 = -0.18
Subaru division of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.: 2.92 - 2.10 = +0.82
Toyota Motor Corporation: 3.34 - 3.72 = -0.38
Volkswagen AG: 1.85 - 1.06 = +0.79

By this list, Subaru, Volkswagen, and Mitsubishi have shown the greatest improvement; however, Subaru's Auto Reliability Grade for the most recent model years is a B (exactly the same as its overall 2010 average and likely what it would have been in 1988), Mitsubishi's is a B (also exactly the same as its overall 2010 average and likely what it would have been in 1988), and Volkswagen's is a C (versus an overall 2010 average of a D).

Also by this list, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, and BMW suffered the greatest decline. Toyota's reliability remains strong, with an Auto Reliability Grade of a very strong B even for the most recent model years. However, BMW's grade for the most recent model years (2006 to 2009) is a D and Mercedes' is a C, both having declined rather significantly from 1988, when they would likely have both been Bs.

Most telling of the time and effort required to improve quality are Ford's improvements. Ford has shown gains in all three of the above reliability measures and its rise in quality is noticeable as early as 1991; nonetheless, its 2010 Auto Reliability GPA for the most recent model years (2006 to 2009) is a very modest 2.21, a C by letter grade. This suggests that it may be decades more before Ford Motor Company will match the reliability of Honda Motor Company (with a 2010 overall GPA of 3.35) or Toyota Motor Corporation (with a 2010 overall GPA of 3.49) and many decades more before the remaining two of the Detroit Three will match the reliability of the automotive industry's leaders.

www.made-from-india.com with versatile experience in the automobile industry, maintains a huge database of manufacturers, exporters and suppliers of automobile, automobile factories, auto accessories, auto body building & parts, auto electrical spares, auto parts, brakes, tyres & tubes etc.